The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Editorial: Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine: Rising Stars 2021
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, June 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2022.928981 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lijun Wang, Gui-e Xu, Longlu Pan, Elena Aikawa, Masanori Aikawa, Junjie Xiao, Ngan F. Huang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 57% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 29% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Members of the public | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2022.
All research outputs
#6,201,129
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#933
of 6,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,244
of 441,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#119
of 961 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,666 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 961 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.