The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Case report: Recurrent severe mitral regurgitation due to ruptured artificial chords after transapical Neochord mitral valve repair
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2022.985644 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mi Zhou, Ka-chun Un, Chun Ka Wong, On Yat Wong, David Chung Wah Siu, Lixue Yin, Daniel Tai-leung Chan, Simon Cheung Chi Lam |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2023.
All research outputs
#13,434,608
of 23,660,057 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#1,489
of 7,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,530
of 445,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#115
of 955 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,660,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,522 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 955 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.