↓ Skip to main content

Exploration and validation of the influence of angiogenesis-related factors in aortic valve calcification

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploration and validation of the influence of angiogenesis-related factors in aortic valve calcification
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, February 2023
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1061077
Pubmed ID
Authors

XiangJin Kong, LingWei Meng, KaiMing Wei, Xin Lv, ChuanZhen Liu, FuShun Lin, XingHua Gu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2023.
All research outputs
#18,985,884
of 23,539,593 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#3,503
of 7,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,439
of 424,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#271
of 669 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,539,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,418 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 669 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.