The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
CARD9 deficiency improves the recovery of limb ischemia in mice with ambient fine particulate matter exposure
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, February 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1125717 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Qiang Zhu, Xuanyou Liu, Hao Wu, Chunlin Yang, Meifang Wang, Feng Chen, Yuqi Cui, Hong Hao, Michael A. Hill, Zhenguo Liu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2023.
All research outputs
#20,742,895
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#4,476
of 7,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,880
of 345,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#269
of 578 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,246 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 578 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.