↓ Skip to main content

Case report: Stenosis turned leak … and turned stenosis—complications of paravalvular prosthetic leak closure with a plug device

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Case report: Stenosis turned leak … and turned stenosis—complications of paravalvular prosthetic leak closure with a plug device
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, June 2023
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1132063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara Pitta Gros, Olivier Roux, Eric Eeckhout, Matthias Kirsch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#21,362,984
of 23,859,750 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#4,757
of 7,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,692
of 188,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#114
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,859,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,808 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.