The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Time to clinical improvement: an appropriate surrogate endpoint for pulmonary arterial hypertension medication trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1142721 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
An Wang, Mengqi Chen, Qi Zhuang, Lihua Guan, Weiping Xie, Lan Wang, Wei Huang, Zhaozhong Cheng, Shiyong Yu, Hongmei Zhou, Jieyan Shen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#21,365,471
of 23,858,859 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#4,755
of 7,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,083
of 190,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#115
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,858,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,811 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.