The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Central extracorporeal circulatory life support (cECLS) in selected patients with critical cardiogenic shock
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1142953 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leonie Schmack, Bastian Schmack, Maria Papathanasiou, Fadi Al-Rashid, Alexander Weymann, Nikolaus Pizanis, Markus Kamler, Arjang Ruhparwar, Tienush Rassaf, Peter Luedike |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2023.
All research outputs
#20,947,537
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#4,596
of 7,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,599
of 217,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#142
of 303 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,461 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.