The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of selected parameters of inflammation, coagulation system, and formation of extracellular neutrophil traps (NETs) in the perioperative period in patients undergoing endovascular treatment of thoracoabdominal aneurysm with a branched device (t-Branch)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, September 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1153130 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Milena Michalska, Tadeusz Grochowiecki, Aleksandra Wyczałkowska-Tomasik, Leszek Pączek, Tomasz Jakimowicz, Andrzej Cacko, Katarzyna Jama, Albert Stec, Ewa Sikorska, Sławomir Nazarewski, Zbigniew Gałązka |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#20,094,864
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#3,784
of 9,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,001
of 355,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#154
of 524 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,356 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 524 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.