↓ Skip to main content

The long-term safety and effectiveness of the loop technique in left ventricular lead dislocation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The long-term safety and effectiveness of the loop technique in left ventricular lead dislocation
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, September 2023
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1154125
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mengya Dong, Chenyuan Liang, Gong Cheng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2023.
All research outputs
#21,852,709
of 24,383,935 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#5,022
of 8,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,395
of 160,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#138
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,383,935 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,315 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.