The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Significance of RNA N6-methyladenosine regulators in the diagnosis and subtype classification of coronary heart disease using the Gene Expression Omnibus database
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1185873 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yu Jiang, Yaqiang Pan, Tao Long, Junqing Qi, Jianchao Liu, Mengya Zhang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2023.
All research outputs
#17,658,541
of 25,884,216 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#3,497
of 9,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,397
of 365,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#141
of 512 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,884,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,405 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 512 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.