The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Joint 2D–3D cross-pseudo supervision for carotid vessel wall segmentation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1203400 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yahan Zhou, Lin Yang, Yuan Guo, Jing Xu, Yutong Li, Yongjiang Cai, Yuping Duan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2023.
All research outputs
#17,288,374
of 25,387,189 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#3,416
of 9,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,911
of 349,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#127
of 453 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,190 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 453 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.