↓ Skip to main content

Safety and efficacy of renal sympathetic denervation: a 9-year long-term follow-up of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety and efficacy of renal sympathetic denervation: a 9-year long-term follow-up of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, June 2023
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1210801
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Vogt, Jochen Dutzmann, Michael Nußbaum, Daniel Hoyer, Jörn Tongers, Axel Schlitt, Daniel Sedding, Alexander Plehn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#21,420,714
of 23,914,147 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#4,763
of 7,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,926
of 171,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#107
of 314 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,914,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,860 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 314 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.