You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Case Report: Stretching the limits—late valvuloplasty for THV dysfunction following redo mitral valve-in-valve implantation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, October 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1288278 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Meier, Georgios Tzimas, Mariama Akodad, Ali Husain, James Dundas, Julius Jelisejevas, Anson Cheung, Stephanie L. Sellers, Jonathon A. Leipsic, Philipp Blanke, David A. Wood, Janarthanan Sathananthan, John G. Webb |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
#19,404,619
of 24,717,692 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#3,514
of 8,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,462
of 167,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#51
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,692 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.