The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multislice computerized tomography coronary angiography can be a comparable tool to intravascular ultrasound in evaluating “true” coronary artery bifurcations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1292517 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anja Radunović, Radosav Vidaković, Stefan Timčić, Natalija Odanović, Milica Stefanović, Mirko Lipovac, Kosta Krupniković, Aleksandar Mandić, Dejan Kojić, Milosav Tomović, Ivan Ilić |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#20,145,216
of 24,762,960 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#4,144
of 8,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,603
of 168,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#73
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,762,960 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,663 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.