The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Editorial: Year in review: discussions in general cardiovascular medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, December 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1341650 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Riccardo Accioli, Viola Salvini, Junjie Xiao, Pietro Enea Lazzerini, Leonardo Roever, Maurizio Acampa |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#20,291,025
of 24,946,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#4,258
of 8,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,554
of 171,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#97
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,946,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,843 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.