The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non-dipping pulse rate and chronic changes of the kidney in patients with chronic kidney disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2023.911773 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rina Oba, Go Kanzaki, Kotaro Haruhara, Takaya Sasaki, Yusuke Okabayashi, Kentaro Koike, Nobuo Tsuboi, Takashi Yokoo |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#15,232,420
of 23,415,749 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#2,235
of 7,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,506
of 335,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#113
of 626 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,415,749 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,324 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 626 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.