The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical significance of regional constructive and wasted work in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1301140 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chun-Li Wang, Lung-Sheng Wu, Chia-Tung Wu, Yung-Hsin Yeh, Yu-Wen Cheng, Kun-Chi Yen, Yi-Hsin Chan, Chi Chuang, Chi-Tai Kuo, Pao-Hsien Chu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,712,381
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#4,450
of 9,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,520
of 157,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#63
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.