You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A contemporary training concept in critical care cardiology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1351633 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leonhard Binzenhöfer, Nils Gade, Daniel Roden, Inas Saleh, Hugo Lanz, Laura Villegas Sierra, Paula Seifert, Clemens Scherer, Benedikt Schrage, Franz Haertel, Peter M. Spieth, Norman Mangner, Christoph Adler, Daniel Hoyer, Tobias Graf, Hannah Billig, Mostafa Salem, Rafael Henrique Rangel, Walter S. Speidl, Christian Hagl, Jörg Hausleiter, Steffen Massberg, Michael Preusch, Benjamin Meder, David M. Leistner, Peter Luedike, Tienush Rassaf, Sebastian Zimmer, Dirk Westermann, Uwe Zeymer, Andreas Schäfer, Holger Thiele, Enzo Lüsebrink |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 40% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,236,342
of 25,562,515 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#1,474
of 9,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,188
of 199,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#22
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,562,515 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,355 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.