You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a focus on post-dissection care for the vascular medicine clinician
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1352700 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katherine A. Martinez, Brent Gudenkauf, Elizabeth V. Ratchford, Esther S. H. Kim, Garima Sharma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 17% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 91% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,672,692
of 25,958,626 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#554
of 9,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,421
of 333,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#11
of 296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,958,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,422 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.