The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical application of virtual reality in patients with cardiovascular disease: state of the art
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1356361 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Valentina Micheluzzi, Eliano Pio Navarese, Pierluigi Merella, Giuseppe Talanas, Graziana Viola, Stefano Bandino, Chiara Idini, Francesco Burrai, Gavino Casu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,865,147
of 25,635,728 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#4,474
of 9,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,196
of 160,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#58
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,635,728 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,393 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.