↓ Skip to main content

V-A ECMO for neonatal coxsackievirus B fulminant myocarditis: a case report and literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
V-A ECMO for neonatal coxsackievirus B fulminant myocarditis: a case report and literature review
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1364289
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xingchao Li, Li Sun, Shibing Xi, Yaofei Hu, Zhongqin Yu, Hui Liu, Hui Sun, Weili Jing, Li Yuan, Hongyan Liu, Tao Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2024.
All research outputs
#21,237,640
of 26,080,506 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#4,548
of 9,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,952
of 194,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#24
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,080,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,437 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.