The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optical coherence tomography-guided vs. intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1395606 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vaibhav Vats, Aarij Elahi, Sinda Hidri, Rem Ehab Abdelkader, Farhan Munaf, Jennifer Mercika Prince, Muhammad Ahsan Asif, Huzaifa Ahmad Cheema, Adeel Ahmad, Wajeeh Ur Rehman, Abdulqadir J. Nashwan, Raheel Ahmed, Vladimir Lakhter, Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk, Royce P. Vincent |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2024.
All research outputs
#17,861,024
of 26,160,558 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#3,505
of 9,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,220
of 211,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#17
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,160,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,447 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.