The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Case Report: Lacosamide unmasking SCN5A-associated Brugada syndrome in a young female with epilepsy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1406614 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ying-Chi Shen, Jen-Chueh Wu, Ting-Tse Lin, Kai-Chung Chang, Jen-Jen Su, Jyh-Ming Jimmy Juang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,749,712
of 26,176,714 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#1,650
of 9,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,679
of 221,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#8
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,176,714 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,454 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.