The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Importance of Starting With Goals in N-of-1 Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Digital Health, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fdgth.2020.00003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sean A. Munson, Jessica Schroeder, Ravi Karkar, Julie A. Kientz, Chia-Fang Chung, James Fogarty |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 38% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 9 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
| Psychology | 4 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,805,290
of 23,208,901 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Digital Health
#82
of 571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,388
of 390,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Digital Health
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,208,901 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.