The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Distinct Circadian Assessments From Wearable Data Reveal Social Distancing Promoted Internal Desynchrony Between Circadian Markers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Digital Health, November 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fdgth.2021.727504 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yitong Huang, Caleb Mayer, Olivia J. Walch, Clark Bowman, Srijan Sen, Cathy Goldstein, Jonathan Tyler, Daniel B. Forger |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
Researcher | 3 | 16% |
Professor | 2 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 21% |
Engineering | 2 | 11% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2024.
All research outputs
#6,721,404
of 26,306,521 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Digital Health
#242
of 898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,761
of 419,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Digital Health
#25
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,306,521 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.