The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Upper limb movement quality measures: comparing IMUs and optical motion capture in stroke patients performing a drinking task
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Digital Health, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1359776 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T. Unger, R. de Sousa Ribeiro, M. Mokni, T. Weikert, J. Pohl, A. Schwarz, J.P.O. Held, L. Sauerzopf, B. Kühnis, E. Gavagnin, A.R. Luft, R. Gassert, O. Lambercy, C. Awai Easthope, J.G. Schönhammer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 26% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 26% |
| Engineering | 2 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,826,488
of 25,589,756 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Digital Health
#719
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,403
of 159,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Digital Health
#19
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,589,756 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.