The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Attributing Authorship in the Noisy Digitized Correspondence of Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Digital Humanities, April 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fdigh.2018.00004 |
Authors |
Greta Franzini, Mike Kestemont, Gabriela Rotari, Melina Jander, Jeremi K. Ochab, Emily Franzini, Joanna Byszuk, Jan Rybicki |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 21% |
Italy | 4 | 12% |
Poland | 4 | 12% |
Germany | 2 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
Belgium | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 13 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 23 | 70% |
Scientists | 9 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 25% |
Researcher | 3 | 25% |
Librarian | 2 | 17% |
Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 33% |
Linguistics | 3 | 25% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,369,040
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Digital Humanities
#13
of 88 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,645
of 333,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Digital Humanities
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 88 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.