The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of a natural language processing tool for extracting gender, weight, ethnicity, and race in the US food and drug administration adverse event reporting system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Drug Safety and Regulation, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fdsfr.2022.1020943 |
| Authors |
Vivian Dang, Eileen Wu, Cindy M. Kortepeter, Michael Phan, Rongmei Zhang, Yong Ma, Monica A. Muñoz |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2022.
All research outputs
#18,652,089
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Drug Safety and Regulation
#12
of 26 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,780
of 431,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Drug Safety and Regulation
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one scored the same or higher as 14 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.