The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experimental replication of early human behaviour in bird preparation: a pilot-study focusing on bone surface modification and breakage patterns
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Archaeology, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fearc.2024.1411853 |
| Authors |
Mariana Nabais, Anna Rufà, Marina Igreja |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 335. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2024.
All research outputs
#105,533
of 26,559,762 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Archaeology
#3
of 28 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,106
of 253,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Archaeology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,559,762 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 89.0. This one scored the same or higher as 25 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them