↓ Skip to main content

Developing Consequence Thresholds for Storm Models Through Participatory Processes: Case Study of Westerly Rhode Island

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing Consequence Thresholds for Storm Models Through Participatory Processes: Case Study of Westerly Rhode Island
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, June 2019
DOI 10.3389/feart.2019.00133
Authors

Robert Witkop, Austin Becker, Peter Stempel, Isaac Ginis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 22%
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 17%
Environmental Science 3 13%
Social Sciences 3 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 13%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2019.
All research outputs
#13,962,438
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#1,337
of 4,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,241
of 353,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#54
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,749 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.