↓ Skip to main content

Advancing Field-Based GNSS Surveying for Validation of Remotely Sensed Water Surface Elevation Products

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advancing Field-Based GNSS Surveying for Validation of Remotely Sensed Water Surface Elevation Products
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, November 2020
DOI 10.3389/feart.2020.00278
Authors

Lincoln H. Pitcher, Laurence C. Smith, Sarah W. Cooley, Annie Zaino, Robert Carlson, Joseph Pettit, Colin J. Gleason, J. Toby Minear, Jessica V. Fayne, Michael J. Willis, Jasmine S. Hansen, Kelly J. Easterday, Merritt E. Harlan, Theodore Langhorst, Simon N. Topp, Wayana Dolan, Ethan D. Kyzivat, Al Pietroniro, Philip Marsh, Daqing Yang, Tom Carter, Cuyler Onclin, Nasim Hosseini, Evan Wilcox, Daniel Moreira, Muriel Berge-Nguyen, Jean-Francois Cretaux, Tamlin M. Pavelsky

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 34%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 41%
Environmental Science 4 14%
Engineering 3 10%
Physics and Astronomy 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2021.
All research outputs
#14,830,251
of 24,975,845 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#1,402
of 5,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,108
of 521,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#60
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,975,845 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 521,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.