↓ Skip to main content

How to Deal With Multi-Proxy Data for Paleoenvironmental Reconstructions: Applications to a Holocene Lake Sediment Record From the Tian Shan, Central Asia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to Deal With Multi-Proxy Data for Paleoenvironmental Reconstructions: Applications to a Holocene Lake Sediment Record From the Tian Shan, Central Asia
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, September 2020
DOI 10.3389/feart.2020.00353
Authors

Natalie Schroeter, Jaime L. Toney, Stefan Lauterbach, Julia Kalanke, Anja Schwarz, Stefan Schouten, Gerd Gleixner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 41%
Environmental Science 8 18%
Arts and Humanities 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2020.
All research outputs
#15,095,535
of 23,234,261 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#1,613
of 4,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,317
of 399,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#73
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,234,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,823 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.