↓ Skip to main content

Results from the Ice Thickness Models Intercomparison eXperiment Phase 2 (ITMIX2)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Results from the Ice Thickness Models Intercomparison eXperiment Phase 2 (ITMIX2)
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, January 2021
DOI 10.3389/feart.2020.571923
Authors

Daniel Farinotti, Douglas J. Brinkerhoff, Johannes J. Fürst, Prateek Gantayat, Fabien Gillet-Chaulet, Matthias Huss, Paul W. Leclercq, Hansruedi Maurer, Mathieu Morlighem, Ankur Pandit, Antoine Rabatel, RAAJ Ramsankaran, Thomas J. Reerink, Ellen Robo, Emmanuel Rouges, Erik Tamre, Ward J. J. van Pelt, Mauro A. Werder, Mohod Farooq Azam, Huilin Li, Liss M. Andreassen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 19 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 33%
Engineering 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 22 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,904,140
of 26,134,677 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#394
of 6,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,666
of 538,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#29
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,134,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,278 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 538,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.