↓ Skip to main content

Shallow Compaction Modeling and Upscaling: A One-Dimensional Analytical Solution and Upscaling

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shallow Compaction Modeling and Upscaling: A One-Dimensional Analytical Solution and Upscaling
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, December 2021
DOI 10.3389/feart.2021.762176
Authors

Jingchen Zhang, Jingsheng Ma, Gary D. Couples, Nicholas Izuchukwu Osuji

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2022.
All research outputs
#15,437,159
of 23,706,541 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#1,661
of 5,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,076
of 514,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#91
of 427 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,706,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,191 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 427 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.