↓ Skip to main content

A mechanistic model for minimizing pressure loss in the wellbore during drilling by considering the effects of cuttings

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A mechanistic model for minimizing pressure loss in the wellbore during drilling by considering the effects of cuttings
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, January 2023
DOI 10.3389/feart.2022.1036281
Authors

Baixue Li, Xueying Wang, Feifei Zhang, Xi Wang, Yuezhi Wang, Yidi Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2023.
All research outputs
#19,796,688
of 25,202,494 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#2,338
of 6,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,093
of 474,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#112
of 497 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,202,494 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,072 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 497 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.