↓ Skip to main content

Linking top and subsoil types, alteration and degassing processes at Rotokawa geothermal field, New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Linking top and subsoil types, alteration and degassing processes at Rotokawa geothermal field, New Zealand
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, January 2023
DOI 10.3389/feart.2022.1067012
Authors

Cristian Montanaro, Lena Ray, Shane J. Cronin, Aimee Calibugan, Stefanie Rott, Candice Bardsley, Bettina Scheu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 27%
Unspecified 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 36%
Unspecified 1 9%
Energy 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,159,313
of 23,549,388 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#964
of 5,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,434
of 435,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#27
of 495 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,549,388 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,083 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 495 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.