↓ Skip to main content

Mercury Isotopes in Shale Gas From Wufeng-Longmaxi Shale Formation of Sichuan Basin, Southern China: A Preliminary Investigation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mercury Isotopes in Shale Gas From Wufeng-Longmaxi Shale Formation of Sichuan Basin, Southern China: A Preliminary Investigation
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, February 2022
DOI 10.3389/feart.2022.809418
Authors

Shunlin Tang, Yuxiang Ding, Guangyou Zhu, Xinbin Feng, Huaishun Zhang, Penggao Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#18,925,846
of 23,452,723 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#2,467
of 4,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#317,959
of 442,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#188
of 506 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,452,723 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,999 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 506 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.