The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lithologic Hydrocarbon Accumulations in the Upper Jurassic Kalazha Formation in the Foreland Slope, the South Marginal Junggar Basin, Northwest China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Earth Science, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/feart.2022.816960 |
| Authors |
Gang Liu, Xue-Feng Qi, Jian-Zhong Li, Ming Zhu, Bo Yuan, Zhi-Chao Pang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2022.
All research outputs
#18,947,527
of 23,479,361 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#2,471
of 5,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318,076
of 442,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#194
of 509 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,479,361 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,021 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 509 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.