↓ Skip to main content

Influence Evaluation of Sensor Coordinate Error on Microseismic Source Location

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence Evaluation of Sensor Coordinate Error on Microseismic Source Location
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, March 2022
DOI 10.3389/feart.2022.873986
Authors

Tao Li, Bing-Rui Chen, Qing Wang, Xin-Hao Zhu, Xu Wang, Ming-Xing Xie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2022.
All research outputs
#18,146,485
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#2,144
of 4,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,125
of 442,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#170
of 448 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,869 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 448 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.