↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: The Short-Term Climate Prediction System FIO-CPS v2.0 and Its Prediction Skill in ENSO

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: The Short-Term Climate Prediction System FIO-CPS v2.0 and Its Prediction Skill in ENSO
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, March 2022
DOI 10.3389/feart.2022.876874
Authors

Yajuan Song, Qi Shu, Ying Bao, Xiaodan Yang, Zhenya Song

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2022.
All research outputs
#15,691,910
of 23,317,888 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#1,911
of 4,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,793
of 440,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#148
of 489 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,317,888 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,875 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 489 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.