↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Type and Source Analysis of Natural Gas in the Leikoupo Formation of the Sichuan Basin in China

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic Type and Source Analysis of Natural Gas in the Leikoupo Formation of the Sichuan Basin in China
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, July 2022
DOI 10.3389/feart.2022.891252
Authors

Shengfei Qin, Benjian Zhang, Chunhu Huang, Jiyuan Li, Jiamei Wang, Gang Tao, Zheng Zhou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#20,581,703
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#3,129
of 4,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#347,670
of 436,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#249
of 434 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,760 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 434 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.