↓ Skip to main content

Statistical analysis of electric field perturbations in ELF based on the CSES observation data before the earthquake

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statistical analysis of electric field perturbations in ELF based on the CSES observation data before the earthquake
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, February 2023
DOI 10.3389/feart.2023.1101542
Authors

Fu-Zhi Zhang, Jian-Ping Huang, Zhong Li, Xu-Hui Shen, Wen-Jing Li, Qiao Wang, Zhima Zeren, Jin-Lai Liu, Zong-Yu Li, Zhao-Yang Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2023.
All research outputs
#18,965,069
of 23,505,669 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#2,475
of 5,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,253
of 430,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#152
of 545 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,669 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 545 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.