↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of petrophysical classification of strongly heterogeneous reservoirs based on the MRGC algorithm

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of petrophysical classification of strongly heterogeneous reservoirs based on the MRGC algorithm
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, March 2023
DOI 10.3389/feart.2023.1169258
Authors

Xiaoqing Zhao, Quansheng Miao, Ruipu Zhao, Xu Liang, Xiabin Wang, Tengfei Tian

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2023.
All research outputs
#20,173,838
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#2,373
of 6,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,314
of 423,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#65
of 379 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,246 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 379 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.