The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Source-reservoir rock assemblages and hydrocarbon accumulation models in the Middle-Lower Jurassic of eastern Sichuan Basin, China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Earth Science, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/feart.2023.1207994 |
| Authors |
Rong Bai, Shaomin Zhang, Haitao Hong, Chunyu Qin, Yucong Li, Changhong Cai, Xiangye Kong, Nan Li, Dong Lei, Xin Lei, Changyong Wang, Tao Jin, Jinliang Gao, Wenbin Tang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2023.
All research outputs
#21,545,299
of 26,449,643 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#2,968
of 6,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,141
of 367,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#130
of 324 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,449,643 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 324 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.