↓ Skip to main content

Constraints on the structure of the oceanic crust of the Tamu Massif by teleseismic P-wave coda autocorrelation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Constraints on the structure of the oceanic crust of the Tamu Massif by teleseismic P-wave coda autocorrelation
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, August 2023
DOI 10.3389/feart.2023.1218576
Authors

Fucong Xu, Shaoping Lu, Chen Cai, Han Chen, Shaozhe Dong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2023.
All research outputs
#16,779,155
of 26,424,855 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#1,734
of 6,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,983
of 368,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#55
of 333 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,424,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,344 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 333 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.