↓ Skip to main content

The productivity segmented calculation model of perforated horizontal wells considering whether to penetrate the contaminated zone

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The productivity segmented calculation model of perforated horizontal wells considering whether to penetrate the contaminated zone
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, October 2023
DOI 10.3389/feart.2023.1270662
Authors

Shuangshuang Zhang, Kangliang Guo, Haoran Yang, Xinchen Gao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#22,125,500
of 24,688,240 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#3,575
of 5,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,838
of 165,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#47
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,688,240 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,832 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.