↓ Skip to main content

Geofluids as a possible unconventional tool for seismic hazard assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geofluids as a possible unconventional tool for seismic hazard assessment
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, November 2023
DOI 10.3389/feart.2023.1286817
Authors

Giovanni Martinelli, Lisa Pierotti, Gianluca Facca, Fabrizio Gherardi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2023.
All research outputs
#15,919,453
of 25,286,324 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#1,620
of 6,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,641
of 349,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#21
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,286,324 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,099 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.