↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Aeolian-fluvial surficial processes and paleoenvironmental archives: characteristics, mechanisms, and method

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Aeolian-fluvial surficial processes and paleoenvironmental archives: characteristics, mechanisms, and method
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, October 2023
DOI 10.3389/feart.2023.1290955
Authors

Joel Roskin, Lupeng Yu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#17,893,194
of 26,196,613 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#2,186
of 6,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,110
of 371,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#38
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,196,613 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,287 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.