↓ Skip to main content

Historical earthquake records in the Weihe Basin, central China and new insights for geothermal genesis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Historical earthquake records in the Weihe Basin, central China and new insights for geothermal genesis
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/feart.2024.1287450
Authors

Bing Zhou, Yancheng Zhang, Jian Kuang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#21,509,573
of 26,388,722 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#2,951
of 6,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,732
of 387,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#81
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,388,722 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,308 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.