The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Determining the Moho topography using an improved inversion algorithm: a case study from the South China Sea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Earth Science, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/feart.2024.1368296 |
| Authors |
Hui Zhang, Hangtao Yu, Chuang Xu, Rui Li, Lu Bie, Qingyin He, Yiqi Liu, Jinsong Lu, Yinan Xiao, Yang Lyu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#21,266,114
of 26,114,666 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#2,900
of 6,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,160
of 347,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#52
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,114,666 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,278 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.